Wednesday, October 23, 2019
Evaluating Truth And Validity Exercise Essay
The argument ââ¬Å"a mature person is self-directing, so parents who make all their childrenââ¬â¢s for them are doing their offspring a disserviceâ⬠has allot of validity to it, and in more ways than one is true. A child whose parents or guardians make all of his or her decisions for them, are in a way hindering the child because the child does not have the opportunity to think for himself. When that child grows up and needs to be able to make important decisions such as what college to go to, who to marry, or what kind of job to apply for, that child will more likely than not, not know how to properly decide based on the information or facts provided to him or her. For instance if a child grows up and is faced with what college to go to and that child has never had to make any important decision for himself, that child may end up in a college going after a degree program that is not truly what he or she wants to do with their life based on what his or her parent tell them t hey should go into. That child has then wasted four to five years of his or her life and has to start all over searching for the proper degree or job where he or she can thrive financially and be happy. There is a minute percent of children who will be able to overcome the mentality of not having to think on his or her own and be able to make the important decisions that need to be made, but at what price? How many times will that child have to make the wrong choice and suffer because they were not allowed to think on their own? The constant failure and rejection could possibly make matters worse for the child, and could lead to relinquishing all hope. The argument ââ¬Å"the Bible canââ¬â¢t be relevant to todayââ¬â¢s problems; it was written many centuries ago and is filled with archaic phrasingâ⬠is another argument with some validity and non-validity. There are people who claim since the Bible was written over 2,000 years ago that it does not apply to todayââ¬â¢s standards, and there are people who say the teachings in the Bibleà are meant for all people to follow as a general guideline. The argument can go either way, but if you look at what the Bible really is, it is a book with stories, such as a history book, about people who lived 2,000 plus years ago and the things they went through. If you were to say because it was written back a long time ago it does not apply to todayââ¬â¢s standards, would be the same thing as saying because our history books teach about Abraham Lincoln and when he lived in the 1700ââ¬â¢s, that those stories are irrelevant. The Bible is a book for Christian based people to read, and is intended as a guideline for these people on how to properly live their life. There are many stories in the Bible that may or may not apply to todayââ¬â¢s standards, such as the Old Testament teachings, but that is not to say the entire Bible is not relevant to todayââ¬â¢s problems. The Bible teaches not to kill and steal, and if 90 percent of people who are in prison followed these two teachings, they would not be in prison today. The other stories about the people who lived in the Bible days are interesting to some, and not to others, as are most history books ever written about the history of the world. Does this mean we need to stop teaching our children about the history of the world because the teachings in the history books occurred over three centuries ago? I think it just because the Bible represents a faith based book, and that is why it is so ridiculed. The argument ââ¬Å"itââ¬â¢s ridiculous to think that there will be fewer deaths if we ban handguns. Handguns donââ¬â¢t kill people; people kill peopleâ⬠has no validity to it in that an actual handgun itself cannot do anything on its own, it is an inanimate object. A handgun or any other type of gun requires a person to physically pick it up, point, and shoot in order to make it operate; a handgun cannot just fire on its own. When people say that handguns kill people, it is the same as saying that a spoon made another person fat, or a car made another person steal it. These are objects that must have an operator or some sort of life force to operate these inanimate objects. Did handguns assist in the killing of a person is a more proper question to ask. If a person wants another person dead and there is not a handgun around, that person will be creative and come up with another means to kill that person. Take John Wayne Gacy for instance, he did not need the use of a handgun to murder hundreds of young boys, he used rope and scarfsà to strangle his victims. There are people who claim without handguns certain crimes would not take place, and that may be possible, but if the person wanting to perform the crime was adamant on doing it and did not have a gun, that person would use alternative measures to finish the crime.
Tuesday, October 22, 2019
Clemencias revenge Professor Ramos Blog
Clemencias revenge Never marry a Mexican is a short story which the author Sandra Cisneros explains how the main character Clemencia went through seeing her mother having an affair while her father was bedridden, it made Clemencia make poor choices by sleeping with married men throughout her life. Her mother would always tell Clemencia and her sister Ximena to ââ¬Å" never marry a Mexicanâ⬠she took this to heart.clemenica would tell her self that she would marry a Mexican but never really marry anyone at all. She feels that since she now has this experience has made her the person she is today ââ¬Å"Iââ¬â¢m vindictive and cruel and Iââ¬â¢m capable of anythingâ⬠(Cisneros 68). She doesnââ¬â¢t really see what she does wrong all she can think about how stupid their wives are from the multiple married men she has been with. This makes her angry towards her mother for her infidelity and marrying someone who is not Mexican. Clemencia felt that once her motherââ¬â¢s new husband and ki ds moved into their fathers house that she stopped being a mother. She wanted to belong to someone but instead, she borrowed men. This lead to her having an affair with her teacher Drew. Drew was married to Megan but nothing stopped him from seeing Clemencia. Drew then had a child with Megan and Clemencia was feeling okay about it. They eventually stopped seeing each other and moved on with their lives. Now fast forward to Drewââ¬â¢s son who is almost done with high school, Clemencia said: ââ¬Å" Iââ¬â¢ve been waiting patient like a spider all the yearsâ⬠(Cisneros 75). Cisneros stories would leave you having a memorable, cringy and humorous stories. I felt since she never had Drew for herself Clemencia wanted ââ¬Å"to make the boy love me the way I love his fatherâ⬠. (Cisneros 82). She loves the feeling that she has the power of men in her hands she likes to have control and thatââ¬â¢s what she had with Drew and his son. The boy would do anything for her because he loves her but little does he know that she has been having an affair with his father. What do you think heââ¬â¢ll do if he ever finds out? That sheââ¬â¢s only using him as revenge. She took his son under her wing and is sleeping with at would him. She even slept with Drew when his wife gave birth to their son. which I think itââ¬â¢s crazy and a little creepy. She just wanted revenge and she got it by sleeping with his son. Which I think is a great comeback. She would always remember what Drew would tell her things like he loves her, calls her his doradita. Did she ever think about how Drew would lead her on? And technically she isnââ¬â¢t cheating. Drew is the one who is cheating and is sleeping with the Clemencia. A couple of days before they broke off their affair Clemencia was at Drewââ¬â¢s house having dinner. She goes to her backpack and grabs a bag of gummy bears and puts them in her pocket and walks to his wifeââ¬â¢s room. She then began to put gummy bears in Meganââ¬â¢s belongings such as lipsticks, look through her medicine cabinet and the babushka dolls that Drew gave to her. She only put it in spots where Megan would notice it. There isnââ¬â¢t a reason why she did that, maybe she was feeling a little humorous and to just fuck with her. Maybe she wanted to let her know that she was here, or is she trying to break up their marriage. Instead, she said maybe Drew would make an excuse to cover it up. He would blame the ââ¬Å"the cleaning womanââ¬â¢s Mexican voodooâ⬠(Cisneros 81). she then took the smallest doll from the babushka dolls and pulled over by a bridge on her way home and threw the doll in the water. It made her feel better. Which I do think is a little str ange. She would also lay awake at night thinking about suicide and killing someone she then said: ââ¬Å"except itââ¬â¢s not me who I want to killâ⬠. It could be a possibility she was talking about Drew or maybe she wants to kill Megan. Drew is all she thinks about; she tries so hard to try not to call him even though she knows that Drew would tell her to leave him alone. He doesnââ¬â¢t want anything to do to her which then angers her. She just wants someone for herself and she wants to be told that everything is okay, I also feel like she needs validation from someone to make her feel better. She might even have a mental illness. On the other hand, Clemencia just wants to hurt Drew like how he hurt her. She is a vengeful woman and her sleeping with his son is her way of expressing her feelings of revenge, I wonder what she is going to with Drewââ¬â¢s son. Maybe sheââ¬â¢ll keep having a sexual relationship with him or maybe they will get married. Another possibility would be she broke it off with him. For once she could be thinking she wants nothing to do with him anymore. She could have possibly moved on with her life and learn that she needs to stop sleeping with married men because at the end theyââ¬â¢re not hers because they are all married and she is very aware of the things she does with men yet she always ends up being left alone. Which if not good for her mental health. She believes that she is unworthy because she sleeps with married men she would have them in her power but in reality, they really are not. Because they donââ¬â¢t leave their wives for her. The men think that their family is more important than breaking off the marriage or getting divorced. Ho know maybe this time around she would stop sleeping with married men and sleep with single men and she wouldnââ¬â¢t have to worry about ââ¬Å"la otraâ⬠because shell have someone to love and they would love her back. Works citied: Cisenros, Sandra. Women hollering creek and other stories. Bloomsbury, 2004.
Monday, October 21, 2019
buy custom Hearsay Rule essay
buy custom Hearsay Rule essay The purpose of this paper is to discuss about Hearsay Rule embodied under Article VIII, Rule 801 of the Republic Rules of Evidence. I will attempt to discuss the meaning of Hearsay and the dangers of hearsay testimony. Hearsay is defined as a statement taken from out-of-courts in writing or oral to be presented as proof of evidence to assert the truth of the matter as evidence. Hearsay is not admissible in court unless it is supported by circumstantial evidence in the interest of justice upon the discretion of the prosecutor. I will discuss the rule against hearsay and the exclusions from hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is present or not. Under Article XIII of the Federal Rules of Evidence No. 801, Hearsay is defined as a voluntary statement made by the declarant other than the witness in evidence asserting the truth of a statement made outside the court trial or hearing. Suffice it to say, hearsay as a rule is not admissible in court as a valid statement hence it is considered null and void unless otherwise allowed by the court as an exception to the rule and exemption from that rule thereby allowing hearsay testimony based on the statement made by the complainant. Second, hearsay is considered legal and binding if the second party takes oath in court and testifies as to the credibility of his/her assertion and made it in writing or orally on the course of event and the time it happened (Hinkle et al). An out-of-court declaration may be admissible called declaration against interest if said testimony was an assertive statement. Nevertheless, out-of-court statements should be taken under oath by the second party subject for approval upon the judges discretion (FRE Rule 801). Hearsay is usually done either in writing by the witness or orally during interrogation (Steven, M 2007). Hearsay is therefore a statement asserted by the defendant against the witness to escape from getting convicted. The witness may face confusing situation during cross-examination if he/she is merely fabricating a story. Direct cross-examination of the witness will catch him/her off-guard when conflicting ideas occur. The lawyer of the defendant may try to inject commentaries to the declarants statement to confuse and discredit the witness. This is one of the most difficult situations faced by many practitioners. At the same time, this is also the losing point of the complainant if there are some inconsiste ncies made by the declarant. Direct statement offered to prove a certain incident is very hard to disprove. Say, Witness A was a witness to what Witness B (declarant) had declared. This is very strong evidence presented against the defendant. On the other hand, inconsistencies during cross-examination through hearsays alone could be very dangerous due to the following reasons: 1) Ambiguity, 2) Insincerity, 3) Incorrect Memory and 4) Inaccurate Memory. This indicates that the declarant may not be available for interrogation. Therefore, out-of-court statements may not be reliable enough to win a certain case. There are two rules for the exception. One is when a person utters certain statement during a startling event. Secondly, when a statement was being made by the declarant under stress of excitement near the time when the act took place. This is called excited utterance exception under number 2 of Article VIII of FRE- Rule 803. Below is a sample diagram showing testimonial triangle depicting Os statement will be considered hearsay if the trier or fact-finder travels from point A to B going down to C. testified that the light was broken (A). O (declarant) once testified that the light was broken. During the cross-examination, O (declarant) was no longer certain but it was recorded arlier when O was so agitated in giving the details after the act was committed. At this point in time, the statement made by O was credible enough leading to point B on the belief that the light was indeed broken. Psychologically, a person is telling the truth when he/she is at the height of excitement and blurting what occurred without thinking that he/she will turn out to be the witness. In conclusion, Os statement was reliable that the light was broken (shown as C). Os statement is not hearsay (Steven, E. 2007) Exclusions from Hearsay are those statements made by the declarant testifying to the incident in question subject to cross-examination. A statement is not considered hearsay if the declarants testimony was done under oath or under penalty of perjury during trials and hearings in court or in case of deposition. Further, a statement is not considered hearsay if the declarant identifies the same individual as testified prior to the trial. This proves that the assertion made by the declarant is not considered hearsay. The rule against hearsay has lots of exceptions that may be admissible in court without the presence of the declarant. There are about 24 exceptions under the federal rules (FRE- Rule 803) which do not require proofs of evidence even without the declarant, viz: Present Sense Impression A statement made by the declarant describing a situation which allegedly took place. Excited Utterance A startling statement made by the declarant who was still under stress on certain condition when the event happened. Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition A statement made by the declarants present state of mind or physical condition when a certain event happened. Statement Made for Medical Diagnosis or Treatment A statement made as to medical history of certain condition on how it occurred and what was its cause. Recorded Recollection A statement made by the witness once but couldnt recall the whole situation in an accurate manner. Second, it could be a statement made by the witness when a certain event was still fresh in his/her memory vividly describing how it occurred. If accepted, the recorded statement may be read and marked as an exhibit as one of the underlying evidences. Records of a Regularly Conducted Activity A recorded history of certain event or condition with knowledgeable person or has been officially recorded during official business of company organization or on official calls and/or for private use only. If the recording was done regularly, the custodian may be a qualified witness or can issue a certification as to the authenticity of information gathered. Absence of a Record of a Regularly Conducted Activity A recorded event can be made as proof of evidence that an alleged complaint did not take place or even existed. Public Records Official records of office activities are trustworthy evidences. Public Records of Vital Statistics - Legal records of birth, death and marriage are valid proofs of evidences. Absence of a Public Record A testimony or certification certifying that such record in question does not actually exist. Records of Religious Organizations Concerning personal or Family History Recordedd history of religious organization such as birth, baptismal, ancestry, marriage, divorce, death, family tree, etc. Certificates of Marriage, Baptism and similar ceremonies Legal records of ceremonies at the time the act was made as certified by the person performing the act. Family records These are legal facts of family records that may be taken a legal evidence without being contested such as the Bible, family tree, representations, ring engraves, inscriptions on portraits, urn or burial markers. Records of Documents That Affect an Interest in Property - Legal documents of properties are legal and binding if they are duly signed by its owner with copies furnished and archived in public office. Statements in Documents That Affect an Interest in Property A statement contained in a document concerning its property is considered authentic unless contested following due process of law. Statements in Ancient Documents An authentic documentary statement archived within 20 years. Market Reports and Similar Commercial Publication Public records such as receipts, lists, yellow pages or compilations are considered reliable sources as evidence. Statements in Learned Treatises, Periodicals or Pamphlets The statement comprised in treatise, periodical or pamphlet may be examined by an expert as required by the court to support evidences but not as an exhibit. Reputation Concerning Personal or Family History A statement of family lineage can be considered solid evidences of family reputation in the community. Reputation Concerning Boundaries or General History A family background is greatly considered in case of any disputes affecting land boundaries or map relocations. Reputation Concerning Character Character check of an individual. Judgment of a Previous Conviction Evidence signifying final decision of conviction after legal proceedings or a guilty plea has been made; a conviction with death penalty or one year imprisonment; the evidence is acceptable if it is relevant for the judgment and when the prosecutor offer the final conviction in criminal cases aside from being impeached, the judgment would be against the respondent pending an appeal as the case may be but it does not affect in any way its admissibility. Judgments Involving Personal, Family or General History or a Boundary An adjudication permitting to establish matters based on evidence presented in connection with private matters, general history or boundaries. The Catch All Rule or other exceptions Otherwise known as Residual Exceptions, hearsay may be admissible so long as it will serve the purpose in the interest of giving fair judgment. This has been transferred to Rule 807. 801 of FRE describes that a court must establish the declarants intention to assert whether an act of communicating is considered a statement. In as much that the declarant is often unavailable when out-of-court information is presented as evidence in which courts tend to depend on the circumstantial evidence by the declarants assertion. There is no certainty on the declaration of the witness which could possibly be used as evidence upon the judges discretion. Current Rule 801 was created to transfer the yoke to the adversary of the out-of-court statement to attest that the declarant exerted more effort instead of the proponent who generally have pertinent proof of evidence and that the unavailability of the declarant during cross-examination is an indication that no effort has been done to present such assertions. On the premise that there was no intention to oblige the declarant to personally answer during cross-examination is rather biased and not in accordance with what would na turally be assumed that could obfuscate the hearsay rule (American Advisory AUCL). Buy custom Hearsay Rule essay
Sunday, October 20, 2019
5 Independent Presidents Who Won in U.S. History
5 Independent Presidents Who Won in U.S. History Donald Trump has said he might run for president in 2016 as an independent if he doesnt get the respect or the nomination from Republicans. And if you think launching an independent presidential campaign is a fools errand - the chances of winning are infinitesimal - consider the impact Ralph Nader, Ross Perot and others like them have had on the electoral process.Ã What Is an Independent Candidate? The primary role of the independent candidate in modern politics is that of spoiler. And while spoiler is an unpopular role to play he is often able to leverage his position to curry favor for himself and friends. Trumps currency of choice seems to be attention, and as long as hes getting some its very likely the billionaire real estate developer might just blow enough of his own money to hang around through the 2016 general election. The question Republicans are asking is whether Trump would siphon off enough votes from the Republican presidential nominee so as to hand the presidency to the Democrats. Many conservatives had openly raised the theory that Donald Trump ran as an agent of the Democratic Party, and in particular the Clintons, so as to hand the White House to Hillary. So which independent presidential candidates have done the best? And how many votes did they pick up? Heres a look at the most successful independent presidential candidates in history and how they affected the results. Ross Perot The billionaire Texan Ross Perot won a startling 19 percent of the popular vote in the 1992 presidential election in what many believed was the beginning of a third party in American politics. Democrat Bill Clinton won the election and unseated Republican incumbent President George H.W. Bush, a rare defeat in American politics. Perot also won 6 percent of the popular vote in the 2006 election. Ralph Nader The consumer and environmental advocate Ralph Nader won nearly 3 percent of the popular vote in the close 2000 presidential election. Many observers, primarily Democrats, blame Nader for costing Vice President Al Gore the election against Republican nominee George W. Bush.Ã John B. Anderson Andersons name is one few Americans remember. But he won nearly 7 percent of the popular vote in the 1980 presidential election won by Republican Ronald Reagan, who pushed Democrat Jimmy Carter out of the White House after one term. Many people blamed Anderson for Carters loss. George Wallace In 1968 Wallace won 14 percent of the popular vote. Republican Richard Nixon defeated Democrat Hubert Humphrey in that election, but Wallaces showing was impressive for an American Independent.Ã Theodore Roosevelt Roosevelt won more than 27 percent of the vote in 1912 when he ran as a progressive candidate. He didnt win. But carrying a quarter of the vote is impressive, especially when you consider the Republican nominee, William Howard Taft, carried only 23 percent. Democrat Woodrow Wilson won with 42 percent of the vote.
Saturday, October 19, 2019
Research & Presentation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words
Research & Presentation - Essay Example D.). In keeping up with communication in an organization effectively, and efficiently a Human Resources manager is overseeing the importance of proper communication between lower level Human Resource managers, and senior level Human Resource managers. Having a stable, and reliable Information Technology system will ensure that the Human Resource managers will be kept up to date, and promptly informed if there is a change in anything, anywhere in the organization. This means if an organization is a multinational company the organization will benefit from having an up-to-date Information Technology department. The Human Resource management team will be able to communicate effectively, and efficiently with Human Resource managers in another nation. Having an effective, and reliable Information Technology system is important because if the Human Resources management team is not able to communicate effectively and efficiently with members of the team within the organization, the company w ill not remain competitive. Before a company can remain competitive a company needs to implement an Information Technology department, and everyone within the organization needs to communicate effectively, and efficiently. Companyââ¬â¢s who are not contemporary companies and make use of Information Technology, and the computer cannot compete effectively with larger, more experienced companies who do utilize Information Technology. The Human Resources manger is able to keep files on employees in a database on the computer. The database is part of the Information Technology system. When Human Resource managers maintain records on employees in a database, Human Resource managers are able to maintain accurate information about an employees performance. In keeping accurate information on employee performances Human Resource managers will know when it comes time to terminate an employee. Human Resource managers maintain positive information about employees as well. Having the positive information at the Human Resource managers fingertips will allow a Human Resources manager to know when to give an employee a raise. Traditionally, Human Resource managers would maintain accurate information on the employee benefits package. This was done manually, and the information was stored in a file in a filing cabinet in the Human Resource managers office. Today, the Human Resource management team will maintain accurate information on employee benefit packages through the use of a database. This information can be shared with other Human Resource managers, and others within the organization who are in need of the information with the use of the Information Technology system. With the use of a reliable, and effective Information Technology system senior Human Resource managers are able to effectively communicate within the organization a number of important information. The Human Resource managers have come to rely on the Information Technology system to effectively do their j ob. When a company has an Information Technology system in place the company can effectively communicate within the organization whether, or not the company is a multinational company. The Information
Friday, October 18, 2019
Parents Response Reflection Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
Parents Response Reflection - Essay Example In answering the questions of the parents, I believe that I should be armed with the thorough knowledge and understanding of these preset standards in order to provide them with an adequate and accurate comprehension of their children's development. I choose to base this reflection in the national standard in science from grades K to four which can be downloaded at EducationWorld.com and is attached as an appendix. According to this standard, these grade levels should be able to grasp seven concepts of understanding: science as inquiry; physical science; life science; earth and space science; science and technology; personal and social perspectives; and history of nature and science. It should be noted that these concepts should be thoroughly taught by the teacher through the use of different activities, techniques, and communication style which are suitable to the age and level of understanding of students. Teaching science is one of the most interesting and equally challenging tasks of a teacher who is handling children at very young ages. In answer to the parent's question of how his child is performing inside the classroom, it is very much important to consider the preset standards against the perceived understanding, reception, participation, and output of the student. The child's performance should of course be in consideration with his age and the performance of his peers. It should be noted that a six year old child cannot be expected to memorize the entire periodic table or name all the bones in the body. Thus, the performance should be based on his ability and knowledge acquired from attending the classes. A good measure of a student's performance will be his grades in activities like recitations, quizzes, examinations, and home works. All of these should be mentioned to the parents in order to them to generate an adequate level of understanding on their children's performance . Another measure will be to compare the performance of the child to his classmates. This will give an idea the development of the child with his age group. The question of how I am helping the child to meet the national standards should reflect my recognition of the differing needs of each student and how I specifically tailor my teaching style in order to accommodate these differences. It will also be very important to highlight the various activities which are provided to the class in order for them to readily grasp an understanding of the concepts which are taught. For example, lectures are important but this will rather be boring for small children. Thus, they should be complemented with simple experiments, exercises, field trips, among others. Experiments will allow students to unlock the scientific concepts through firsthand experience while making them familiar with the process that scientists need to conduct first in order to validate their claims. In addition to these explanations, it will also be important to stress the difference of each child and how their specific needs are being met. In my experience, students learn at their own pace which is usually different from their peers. Also, some students learn through different techniques and circumstances. Thus, there is a need to have various activities and teaching techniques which will benefit everyone. In
Leadership Effectiveness, Leadership Style and Employee Readiness Essay
Leadership Effectiveness, Leadership Style and Employee Readiness - Essay Example In SLT, leadership effectiveness is thought to be enhanced if "a manager uses the style of leadership that best matches the readiness, ability and willingness of subordinates and that a good match between leadership style and subordinate readiness leads to a higher level of subordinate satisfaction and performance." (Chen & Silverthorne, 2005, pp.280-288). The focus of this article was primarily to thoroughly view, discuss, and advise on the topic of proper leadership. The matter of how truly crucial good leadership is (in the workplace) and how the actions of the leader(s) affect the overall outcome is a major point of discussion in the article, with Chen and Silverthorne's main precept being that as the level of follower readiness increases, so will that of the leader, and that "a leader's task and behaviors interact with subordinate readiness to significantly influence leader effectiveness, which is defined as the extent to which a follower demonstrates the ability and willingness to accomplish a specific task." (Chen & Silverthorne, 2005, pp.280-288). In other words, the way a leader behaves and interacts and the methods he uses with employees incredibly affect the ability and will... In other words, the way a leader behaves and interacts and the methods he uses with employees incredibly affect the ability and willingness the employees (or 'followers') will have to accomplish specific tasks. What are Three Major Findings we can Draw From This Article The first and perhaps most significant finding which can be drawn after a review of this article is that of how incredibly crucial proper leadership is. It is the leaders who make the greatest impact, whether physically, emotionally, or efficiently; it has been said that leaders "have a strong influence on employee and organizational outcomes." (Vries et al, 1998, pp.486-501). One of the main sources of job stress has been linked to the organizational climate and staff attitude created by the leadership style of supervisors and managers in the workplace. It is for reasons such as this that Chen and Silverthorne wrote this article; leadership is a critical subject matter in regards to efficient and positive results. Another finding is that of employee satisfaction and how important a factor it is in the overall scheme of things. "It has long been believed that employee satisfaction increases employee performance and productivity and satisfaction and performance are correlated." (Lucas, 1999, pp.774-778). Voluntary turnover occurs when an employee terminates the employment relationship themselves. In 2001, Price found that most turnover is voluntary and is, therefore, potentially avoidable and controllable, costly, and disruptive to an organization. (pp.353-508). Whether particularly regarding poor job feedback, job dissatisfaction, unmet job expectations, performance
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)